by Will Ross
---
The easiest
way to explain Holy Motors is to simply show it to someone, but I’ll try to do it
here anyway: Oscar, a middle-aged man (Denis Lavant) is driven around
town in a limousine to various “appointments.” For each one, he dons
distinct costumes and makeup, be it as an old woman, a surreally creepy
and insane imp, or a motion-capture performer. In each of these
appointments (which are essentially discreet short films), he meets and
interacts with new characters in separate genres, and the scenarios
often involve maiming, murder, and heartbreak. But then he gets up and
returns to the limousine, totally calm and healthy after each
appointment (save for one).
If it wasn’t clear, Holy Motors
is about filmmaking. Beyond that point it is an experiment in form that resists comprehension. Though each of the
appointments works entirely on its own terms, the overarching
“narrative” of the job that keeps Oscar moving between these roles is
the film’s x-factor, what makes it more than a compilation of unrelated
shorts.
Assuming
you enjoy the appointment stories, your position on the spectrum of
appreciation between “fun diversion” and “game-changing masterpiece”
depends on the value you attach to the “hub” story. And though I enjoy the
ingenuity of Oscar’s narrative, and the ambiguity of how “real” each of
the appointments are in his already-surreal world, I can’t say I see it
as a revolutionary overturning of filmic conventions. A great formal
idea, to be sure, but it’s folly to equate an un-graspable structure with
a coup de cinema.
None
of this is to say that the film doesn’t work, simply that some have
overstated its complexity. If you buy into it as brilliant on a
conceptual level, you’re sure to have a great time. But even if you
don’t, there’s plenty to enjoy here: the real core of Holy Motors
is not its superstructure, but the little appointment stories
themselves, and each of the dozen or so stories are imaginative and
compelling in their own right. Like Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales,
the frame story mostly functions as a good excuse to tell a host of
wildly different tales, from gangster drama to family drama to romantic
musical. Lavant commits himself completely to each story, in a host of
performances that show extraordinary range in tone, psychology, physical
demands, and age.
Lavant may be more responsible than anything else for the coherence of Holy Motors,
but without the vision of director Leos Carax, the film could have been
a mess. Carax uses a palette and camera style that suits the full range
of genres, and never indulges in the ironic detachment that this
structure might have suggested, but could have made the film
unapproachable and unfun. But fun it is, and funny, and sometimes
heartbreaking, on a number of levels. Holy Motors
can surely offer any cinephile at least one thing to love. No matter whether you appreciate it as a whole or in parts, it is an essential experience.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
About
The home of Sad Hill Media, where we make (and write about) movies.
-D. Scott & W. Ross
-D. Scott & W. Ross
Labels
- 60s Stint (1)
- Devan's Posts (22)
- Diaries (5)
- Essays (1)
- Games (3)
- Guest Pieces (1)
- James Bond (2)
- John Ford (9)
- Man of Steel Week (4)
- Music (5)
- Politics (3)
- Reviews (104)
- Satire (1)
- We Three Heathens (2)
- Will's Posts (119)
Archive
Powered by Blogger.
0 comments:
Post a Comment