by Will Ross
---
Lonesome
may be as strong a case for auteurism as can be found: despite working
with an inert story, flat characters, and shallow themes, director Paul
Fejos poured his creative heart and soul into the film. After many
decades of obscurity for both it and its makers, the film has developed a
reputation almost exclusively thanks to its director's vision, which is ingenious and batshit-crazy.
Factory
worker Jim (Glenn Tryon) and telephone operator Mary (Barbara Kent),
two shy and lonely New Yorkers, meet each other at Coney Island during a
day off from the mechanical drone of their jobs. While there, they
quickly fall for one another and enjoy a near-perfect day, until they
are separated by the brief mechanical failure of a ride and a storm.
Each knows only the other’s first names, and they finally give up
searching and go home defeated. But coincidence intervenes: when Jim
plays a record of a song they heard at Coney Island, Mary hears it
through her apartment wall! The two are reunited.
That’s it. From a plot and character perspective, there is very little to elaborate from there. And thematically, Lonesome
doesn’t cover much ground beyond the basic observation that urban
isolation exists, but can be overcome. One need look no further than
King Vidor’s The Crowd, another story of the crushing anonymity of city life released a few months before Lonesome, for a much more complex and evocative take on the subject.
But Lonesome
is a dreamer, and sets itself apart in history with its
balls-to-the-wall technical feats and energetic images. Trick shots,
elaborate camera movements, and some hand-coloured sequences abound. They take what could've been a faceless bore, and turn it into dazzling,
experiential cinema with the barest of plots keeping its heart in a
sweet and simple place. When describing Lonesome, one will speak mostly little details and moments, like a shot where Barbara
Kent’s hat brim glows impossibly bright like a halo, or the
shifting tints that give way to colourized projections in the dance
scene.
Speaking of which, the sound design in Lonesome is
fantastic, some of the best sound-on-film for a "silent" film that I know of. Not only
does the score smartly mix with ambient crowd noises (a technique
probably inspired by the marvelous soundtrack of F.W. Murnau's Sunrise: A Song of Two Humans), but there are moments of bravura sound storytelling. The
aforementioned ending scene of a record heard through the wall is
impressive, but an early sequence is even better: while sitting in his
apartment, Jim hears a band, and looking out his window sees them
playing on a truck, advertising Coney Island and excitedly resolves to
go. Moments later, Mary hears the same sound in her apartment, and
resolves similarly. It’s a wonderful way to both physically separate the
characters (who still have not met at this point), and to hint that
they are about to meet each other, even if in light of them living in
adjacent apartments, it makes no sense for them to hear the same band
passing by moments apart.
But after all, few will mistake Lonesome
for is a perfect film. Least of all, I suspect, would its director, who seems
to have been hell-bent on pushing his kaleidoscope style as far as
possible, regardless of narrative consistency. The fact that he
succeeded — even after of three crushingly awkward and out-of-place
sound sequences were added to the film without Fejos’s approval — is a good lesson of professionalism and craftsmanship: Fejos’s name is
known today because he used a large budget and absolute dedication to
cinema’s formal possibilities to turn a ratty love story into a sweet
little whirlwind of city life.

No comments:
Post a Comment